Legal Opinion
Hartnett v. Southern Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided December 15, 1965No. 34248PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
181 So.2d 524 (1965)
James HARTNETT and Blanche Hartnett, Petitioners,
v.
SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
No. 34248.
Supreme Court of Florida.
December 15, 1965.
Ernest Ridarsick, Miami, and Broad & Cassel, Miami Beach, for petitioners.
Dean, Adams & Fischer, Miami, for respondent.
DREW, Justice.
After finding that the insured paid premiums for coverage under Coverage "A" of his policy of insurance on his automobile, reading as follows:
"Coverage A Comprehensive Loss of or Damage to the Automobile, Except by Collision or Upset: To pay for direct and accidental loss of or damage to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Firemans Fund Ins. Co. of San Francisco v. BoydSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Hartnett v. Southern Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
3Cited by39 opinions
- Washington National Insurance v. RudermanSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Stuyvesant Insurance Company v. ButlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Westmoreland v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Nat. Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United Serv. Auto. Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Berkshire Life Ins. Co. v. AdelbergSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.