Legal Opinion

Hartnett v. Southern Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 9, 1965No. 64-587PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

Appellant, owner of an automobile insured by appellee, made claim for the loss thereof when the automobile disappeared from appellant’s home. The automobile has never been recovered. The appellant purchased insurance coverage and paid premiums for coverage under items listed in the policy as "Coverage A,” “Coverage B,” and “Coverage G.1” Coverage under item “D 2” listed in the policy was not purchased by appellant, nor did he pay a premium for that coverage. After the disappearance of appellant’s automobile, he reported it to the police and to the appellee insurer, subsequently…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frank v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hartnett v. Southern Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  2. Hartnett v. Southern Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API