Legal Opinion

State v. Schenk

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 22, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

100 N.J. Super. 122 (1968)

241 A.2d 267

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

GERALD SCHENK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 11, 1968.

Decided March 22, 1968.

Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.

Mrs. Esther Strum Frankel argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Frankel & Frankel, attorneys).

Mr. Rushton H. Ridgway, Assistant County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Joseph Tuso, County Prosecutor, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by COLLESTER, J.A.D.

Defendant Gerald Schenk appeals from a conviction,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. State v. PisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  4. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
  5. O'Daniel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. People v. LeFebreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. State v. Interest of MNNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  4. People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. State v. HeardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API