Legal Opinion
Barry, Bette & Led Duke, Inc. v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided April 16, 1996No. Claim No. 74178PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
James P. King, J.
Motion by defendant for an order dismissing the second cause of action.1
After the close of evidence in trial of this action, defendant moved to dismiss the claim’s second cause of action brought by claimant Barry, Bette & Led Duke (BBL) on behalf of its subcontractor C.T. Brickman & Associates, Inc. (Brickman). BBL was the prime general construction contractor on an Office of General Services (OGS) project to build a headquarters complex for the New York State Division of Military and Naval Affairs, and Brickman was BBL’s subcontractor for work on the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- BROWN BROS. v. Beam Constr.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- West-Fair Electric Contractors v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Mars Associates, Inc. v. New York City Educational Construction FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Lambert Houses Redevelopment Co. v. HRH Equity Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MBIA Ins. Corp. v. Royal Bank of CanadaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In Re Regional Building Systems, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2001