Legal Opinion

In re the Construction of the Will of Muller

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 6, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

This proceeding has been brought for the construction of those provisions of the testator’s will, pertaining to the allocation of stock dividends, which have been considered by Surrogates of this court in five prior decisions (Matter of Muller, N. Y. L. J., Nov. 29, 1956, p. 9, col. 2 ; Matter of Muller, 145 N. Y. S. 2d 283 ; Matter of Muller, 5 Misc 2d 83 ; Matter of Muller, 15 Misc 2d 32). It would seem that such earlier determinations have established the law of the ease (Matter of Pessano, 181 Misc. 295 ; Matter of Leverich, 135 Misc. *1074774, affd. 234 App. Div. 625 ;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re MeekerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  2. McCracken v. GulickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  3. McCoy v. McCloskeyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  4. In re the Estate of MoranNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  5. Union County Trust Co. v. GrayNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of MullerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API