Legal Opinion

Galbraith v. Chicago Architectural Iron Works

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 17, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Memorandum.—Action of assumpsit upon a building contract. Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding. Declaration on the common counts; plea, general issue; trial by the court; judgment for plaintiff; appeal by the defendant. Heard in this court at the March term, 1893. Reversed and remanded.

1Opinion of the Court

Opibioh of the Court,

Gary, P. J.

■ This is an action for work done under a contract for constructing the iron arch entrances, etc., of a building. The contract required the work to be done by March 15, 1892, and payment to be made within thirty days after the work ■was done, provided that the architect should certify that it had been done to his satisfaction.

The work was not finished by March 15, and June 22, 1892, the architect did certify that the entire work was finally completed May 21, 1892, but omitted any reference to his own satisfaction.

The appellant claimed damages for the delay,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wadhams v. SwanIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Benton v. J. A. Fay & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Fowler v. DeakmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Korf v. LullIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Zjednoczenie v. SadeckiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sanitary District of Chicago v. McMahon & Montgomery Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  2. Ambrose v. BiggsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Edward Edinger Co. v. WillisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  4. Gustafson v. Michigan Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API