Davis & Aubin v. John Bradley & Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Trover, for a quantity of wool. Plea, the general issue, and trial by the court. The plaintiffs, to sustain the issue on their part, offered a bill of sale, of a quantity of wool, from Sanborn & Catlin to B. & H. Boynton, of which the following is a copy, viz : “ Bill of Sale.”
Read the full summary
Trover, for a quantity of wool. Plea, the general issue, and trial by the court. The plaintiffs, to sustain the issue on their part, offered a bill of sale, of a quantity of wool, from Sanborn & Catlin to B. & H. Boynton, of which the following is a copy, viz : “ Bill of Sale.” “ Swanton, June 2,1848. “ B. & H. Boynton, “ Bought of Sanborn & Catlin, “ 2042 lbs. superfine wool, “ 2072 “ fine wool, “ 922 “ coarse wool, “ 190 “ No. 2, coarse wool, “ 147 “ washed wool, “ 268 “ black wool, “5641 “ pelt wool, 28 cts., • $1579,48 “ 329 “ tags 3 cts., • 9,87 “ 3110 “ coarse unwashed wool 18 cts.,…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Isham, J.
The plaintiffs’ right to the property for which this action is brought, depends upon the title of B. & H. Boynton, under their bill of sale from Sanborn & Catlin. As against the Boyntons the plaintiffs’ title has not been disputed. But it is insisted that the Boyntons had no title to this property, and consequently could convey none to the plaintiffs, and that it was competent for the defendants to introduce parol evidence showing that the sale, from Sanborn & Catlin to the Boyntons, was made upSn certain conditions, which having never been…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boorman v. JenkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1834
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davis & Aubin v. John Bradley & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1855
- Joslyn v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1878
- Alkire Grocer Co. v. TagartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
- Tilden v. Minor, Smith & MoriartySupreme Court of Vermont · 1872
- Everett v. HallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1878
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.