Legal Opinion

Everett v. Hall

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 3, 1878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On exceptions. Trover for a shingle machine. Yerdictfor the plaintiff for $226.10; and the defendant alleged exceptions.

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

One Pearson purchased a shingle machine, giving the seller a note therefor and a mortgage on the machine to secure the same. The plaintiff is the assignee of the note and mortgage. On the day of the purchase, before the mortgage was recorded, Pearson sold the machine to the defendant under an agreement that the title should remain in Pearson until the machine was paid for, the defendant taking and keeping possession. Iff a few days thereafter the mortgage was recorded, before which something was paid towards the machine by the defendant, and he had fully paid Pearson therefor when this action…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis & Aubin v. John Bradley & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1851

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. TuftsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Redewill v. GillenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API