Clark v. Louisville N. R. R. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
This suit is by the appellant against appellee to recover damages growing out of delay In the transmission and delivery of a carload of potatoes received originally by the defendant as initial carrier for shipment from Castleberry, Ala., to Cincinnati, Ohio.
Demurrers to counts 1 and 3 were overruled, but sustained as to counts 2 and 4, and count 4 as amended. By reason of the adverse ruling of the court as to these la'tter counts, plaintiff suffered a nonsuit, and ap-' peals to review the action of the court’ in sustaining said demurrer to counts 2, 4, and 4 as amended.
The shipment was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. J. F. French & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Melbourne & Troy v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Parker-Bell Lumber Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. AllgoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Transmarine Corporation v. Charles H. Levitt & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Rice & Lockwood Lumber Co. v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Dearborn Stove Company v. DeanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. MarsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.