Legal Opinion

Clark v. Louisville N. R. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 20, 1927No. 3 Div. 809PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

This suit is by the appellant against appellee to recover damages growing out of delay In the transmission and delivery of a carload of potatoes received originally by the defendant as initial carrier for shipment from Castleberry, Ala., to Cincinnati, Ohio.

Demurrers to counts 1 and 3 were overruled, but sustained as to counts 2 and 4, and count 4 as amended. By reason of the adverse ruling of the court as to these la'tter counts, plaintiff suffered a nonsuit, and ap-' peals to review the action of the court’ in sustaining said demurrer to counts 2, 4, and 4 as amended.

The shipment was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. J. F. French & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Melbourne & Troy v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. Parker-Bell Lumber Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. AllgoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Transmarine Corporation v. Charles H. Levitt & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  2. Rice & Lockwood Lumber Co. v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Dearborn Stove Company v. DeanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. MarsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API