Legal Opinion

Rice & Lockwood Lumber Co. v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 10, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

This is an action of contract to recover for three lots of oak flooring which were a part of a carload shipped on October 28, 1939, from Warren, Arkansas, to Malden in this Commonwealth “With stopover at Lowell, Mass, for partial unloading.” This car also contained a fourth lot of flooring which the plaintiff had sold to the Russell Lumber Company in Lowell. The plaintiff wrote the defendant on November 1, 1939, to deliver the car upon its arrival at Lowell to the Russell Lumber Company (hereafter called the lumber company); it had requested the lumber company when it had removed its lot of…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Berwick & Smith Co. v. Salem Press, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  3. United Firemen's Ins. Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Fluoro Electric Corp. v. Smith Transport Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  5. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API