Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beam v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 14, 2014No. 1120678 and 1120679Published

1DissentMoore, Chief Justice

(dissenting in case no. 1120678).

I respectfully dissent. For the reasons that follow, I believe the circuit court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this con-servatorship.

I. Statutory Construction

The language of § 26-2-2, Ala.Code 1975, does not expressly require that the petition to remove the conservatorship be *580filed in, and the removal order entered by, the circuit court. The statute reads:

“[A]n order of removal must be made by the court or judge upon the filing of a sworn petition by any such guardian or conservator or guardian ad litem or next friend for the ward or such person…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SeymourSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Darks Dairy, Inc. v. Ala. Dairy Com'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Ex Parte Discount Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. DuBose v. WeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Alabama · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API