Chilton v. City of Springfield, 2007 Ca 1 (2-8-2008)

OPINION

{¶ 1} Paul and Mary Joyce Chilton, pro se, appeal from a judgment of the Clark County Court of Common Pleas, which affirmed the denial of a variance by the Springfield Board of Building Appeals ("the Board"). The Chiltons claim that the trial court erred in concluding that the City of Springfield's order to repair or demolish was not subject to the Bankruptcy Code's automatic stay provision, contained in Section 362(a), Title 11, U.S. Code, and in affirming the Board's decision. For the following reasons, the judgment will be affirmed.

{¶ 2} Paul and Mary Joyce Chilton are the owners of…