Legal Opinion
District of Columbia Department of the Environment v. East Capitol Exxon
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 25, 2013No. Nos. 11-AA-216, 11-AA-540PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BECKWITH, Associate Judge:
The District of Columbia Department of the Environment (DDOE) seeks review of an order of the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) dismissing one of three charged infractions against respondent East Capitol Exxon for alleged defects in the gas station’s vapor recovery systems that violated the District of Columbia’s air quality regulations. We hold that OAH must give the same deference that this court gives to DDOE’s interpretations of its authorizing statutes and regulations, meaning that it must defer to an interpretation that is not plainly wrong or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. FruehaufSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Daka, Inc. v. BreinerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mirna Placido v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Compass Group USA, Inc. and Gallagher Bassett ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Aeon Financial, LLC v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Vizion One, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Health Care FinanceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Bartholomew v. District of Columbia Office of Tax & RevenueDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Rouzbeh E. Mazanderan v. District of Columbia Department of Public WorksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.