Legal Opinion

Von Wedel v. Clark

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 1, 1949No. 11422PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEANEY, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity brought under Section 9(a) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 9(a), hereinafter referred to as the Act, to recover certain property vested in the Attorney General as successor to the Alien Property Custodian. The case is before *300the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state a claim on which relief may he granted, in that it appears on the face of the complaint that the plaintiff has no interest, right or title in the property within the meaning of Section 9(a) of the Act.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holladay v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Brassert v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. Kaname Fujino v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1947
  4. Miyuki Okihara v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1947
  5. Clark Car Co. of New Jersey v. ClarkDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. King v. BankerdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Von Wedel v. McGrathDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
  3. von Wedel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. Orban v. State Automobile AssociationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Schumacher v. BrownellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API