Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Stromberg-Mullins Co. v. District Court of the Second Judicial District

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1903No. 1,932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ORIGINAL application for writ of mandamus by tlie state, on tlie relation of the Stromberg-Mullins Company, against tbe Second Judicial District Court in and for tlie county of Silver Bow, and William Clancy, a judge thereof. On motion to quash.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

Original application for a wilt of mandamus to compel William Clancy, as judge of the Second judicial district court, to settle a statement on motion for a new1 trial. On application to this court an alternative writ was issued, directing the defendant judge to settle the statement or show cause why he had not done so. He appeared by motion to quash the writ, and also by answer. After argument, the question of law arising upon the record was submitted.

Thera is no material controversy as to the facts. So-1 far as they are necessary to be stated, they are the following: The causa of Harrington…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ogle v. PotterMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Sweeney v. Great Falls & Canada Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sinko v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Wright v. MathewsMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Amacher v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Smith v. ShookMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State ex rel. Jones v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API