In re Mix

This is a disciplinary proceeding. Respondent is charged with professional misconduct in three particulars. The issues framed by the petition and answer have been referred to an official referee. He has found that the evidence fails to sustain the charges, or to justify any disciplinary action by the court. We regret to say that, after a most careful review of the evidence, we have reached an entirely different conclusion.

The first charge which has been made against the respondent relates to the so-called White loan. On August 28, 1928, David A. White applied to the respondent for a loan of…