Legal Opinion

Merchants Realty & Investment Co. v. Kelso

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1920No. Civ. No. 2732PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Action to recover on a subscription contract whereby the defendant agreed to take and pay for shares of stock of plaintiff corporation. The defendant claimed the right to rescind the contract upon the ground that the agents of the corporation in their negotiations with the defendant, which resulted in the contract, falsely and fraudulently represented to the defendant that the capital stock of the corporation was nonassessable; that the defendant signed the contract in reliance upon said statements which he believed to be true and without which he would not have entered into such contract. At…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Champion v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Haviland v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Carr v. Sacramento Clay Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Browne v. San Gabriel River Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. McCarter v. ZellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Merchants Realty & Investment Co. Realty v. NeigerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Merchants Realty and Investment Co. v. NeigerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API