National Union Fire Insurance v. Binker
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
On July 23, 1991, the Court held what had been scheduled to be a bench trial in this action. Because the parties had stipulated to all relevant facts, and the original plaintiff, Nationwide Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., and defendant, Bonnie L. Binker, had settled their portion of the case, counsel for third-party plaintiff, Binker, and third-party defendant, Travelers Indemnity Company, simply presented arguments on behalf of the parties as to their remaining portion of the case. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
- Storm v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
- American Auto. Ins. Co. v. FulcherCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
- Moomaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.