Legal Opinion
Moomaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided September 23, 1974No. Civ. A. 73-242-CHPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
K. K. HALL, District Judge.
In this action plaintiffs seek to recover under the uninsured motorists provision of different automobile liability insurance policies issued by the two defendants. The issues are before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment based on the record, including supporting affidavits, a counter-affidavit filed by defendant, Federal Mutual Insurance Company, and a stipulation by the parties. Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy and has not been questioned. 28…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Allen v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. v. MaddenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Lambert v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Thompson v. GRANGE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. PacDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Hines v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.