Commonwealth v. Gheen
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
The issue is whether, in sentencing appellant after his probation was revoked, the trial court erred in resentencing him to consecutive terms of imprisonment where the original sentence provided for concurrent terms of probation. The plea bargain underlying the original sentence did not contain an agreement as to the sentence. We find the trial court did not err and affirm the denial of appellant’s PCRA motion.
Relying on Commonwealth v. Anderson, 434 Pa.Super. 309, 643 A.2d 109 (1994), the appellant asserts that on resentencing the trial court was limited by the original sentence…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
3Cited by31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CartretteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. CoolbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. FishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. HooverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.