Legal Opinion

United States v. Battis

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 14, 2009No. 08-2949PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

RENDELL, Circuit Judge.

The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution states that, “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial.” Germaine Battis urges that this right was violated when forty-five months elapsed between his indictment and trial. The District Court reasoned through the four-factor test established by the Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972), and concluded that there was no constitutional violation. On appeal, weighing these four factors anew, we reach a different…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Vermont v. BrillonSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States v. Michael DentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Judge v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  2. United States v. Craig ClaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. SeltzerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Sergio VelazquezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. MuhtorovCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API