Legal Opinion

Flowers v. Acousti Engineering Co. of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 10, 2004No. 1D03-0619PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Reviewing de novo the interpretation of section 440.14(l)(a) & (l)(d), Florida Statutes (1987), which is a question of law, see BellSouth Telecomm, Inc. v. Meeks, 868 So.2d 287, 289 (Fla.2003), we conclude that the Judge of Compensation Claims correctly construed the statute in using Appellant/Claimant’s average weekly wage “at the time of the injury,” — i.e., the date of his 1988 industrial accident rather than the 2001 date when he was determined to be permanently, totally disabled — as the proper basis for computing compensation. See James v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 864 So.2d 1132…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ManningLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. James v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Karnes v. City of Boca RatonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rotstein v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API