Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rotstein v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 24, 2006No. 1D05-0415Published

1DissentErvin, J.

I respectfully dissent. In order to explain my position adequately, I set out additional facts to those given in the majority opinion. As reflected in the parties’ agreement, following the occurrence of claimant’s compensable back injury in 1987, the employer administratively accepted claimant as permanently, totally disabled (PTD) in May 1993. Claimant technically remained an employee, however, and until his separation from employment in 2004, the E/C continued to pay all or part of his group health-insurance premium, when his insurance was terminated. After his separation from employment,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LaforetSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Rustic Lodge v. EscobarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. James v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Wal-Mart Stores v. CampbellSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  5. City of North Bay Village v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API