Legal Opinion

State v. Forcier

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 20, 1994No. 92-530PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Defendant pled nolo contendere to a misdemeanor violation of 23 V.S.A. § 1201(a)(2), driving while intoxicated (DWI), reserving the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress pursuant to V.R.Cr.E 11(a)(2). Defendant argues on appeal that all testimonial and nontestimonial evidence stemming from his DWI arrest must be suppressed because the officers exceeded the arrest authority provided by V.R.Cr.E 3(a)(5) in that they: (1) arrested defendant more than two hours after the alleged offense occurred; and (2) interrogated defendant after they arrested him. We reverse…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. O'BRIEN v. Island Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. State v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. State v. BlaineSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
  5. State v. HollisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  2. State v. ReadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  3. In re Pierce Subdivision ApplicationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  4. State v. BlondinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. Russell v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API