Legal Opinion

Unigestion Holding, S.A. v. UPM Technology, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 13, 2022No. 3:15-cv-00185Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON UNIGESTION HOLDING, S.A., Case No. 3:15-cv-185-SI d/b/a DIGICEL-HAITI, OPINION AND ORDER ON UPM’S Plaintiff, RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND v. DIGICEL-HAITI’S MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION, TO CERTIFY UPM TECHNOLOGY, INC. and INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL, AND DUY BRUCE TRAN, TO CERTIFY QUESTIONS TO THE OREGON SUPREME COURT Defendants. Anne M. Talcott, Kathryn E. Kelly, Andrew J. Lee, and Sara Kobak, SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT PC, 1211 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1900, Portland, OR 97204; and Robert C.L. Vaughan, Cherine Smith Valbrun,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API