Legal Opinion

Archem Co. v. Austin Industrial, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 31, 1991No. 01-89-01252-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

DUGGAN, Justice.

The motion for rehearing filed herein by appellant, Archem Company (“Archem”) is granted. Our prior opinion dated August 31, 1990, is withdrawn and the following is substituted.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment.

Appellee, Austin Industrial, Inc. (“Austin”), supplies temporary labor. Pursuant to a contract for temporary labor, Austin provided Archem with Ray Vallejo, a contract laborer. Vallejo was injured at Ar-chem while steam-cleaning transfusion hoses; he sued Archem for common-law negligence.

Archem moved for summary judgment, alleging…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Producers Chemical Company v. McKayTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Griffin v. RowdenTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Denison v. Haeber Roofing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Carr v. Carroll Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wingfoot Enterprises v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Marshall v. Toys-R-Us Nytex, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Pederson v. Apple Corrugated Packaging, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1994
  4. Garza v. Excel Logistics, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Buenrostro, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API