Marshall v. Toys-R-Us Nytex, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.
Plaintiffs below appeal a summary judgment granted Toys-R-Us Nytex. In a single point of error, appellants claim the trial court erred because (1) Toys-R-Us failed to plead statutory - immunity under the worker’s compensation act, (2) there were fact issues concerning who was Ms. Marshall’s employer and whether Toys-R-Us was a subscriber under the worker’s compensation act, and (3) there was no evidence of actual or constructive notice that Toys-R-Us was a subscriber. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Sherri Marshall was employed through the Star of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Hidalgo v. Surety Savings and Loan AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Westland Oil Development Corp. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Wingfoot Enterprises v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- PAS, INC. v. Engel, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- Brown v. Aztec Rig Equipment, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
- Lockett v. HB Zachry Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
- Williams v. Brown & Root, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.