Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Toys-R-Us Nytex, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 6, 1992No. B14-90-00956-CVPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.

Plaintiffs below appeal a summary judgment granted Toys-R-Us Nytex. In a single point of error, appellants claim the trial court erred because (1) Toys-R-Us failed to plead statutory - immunity under the worker’s compensation act, (2) there were fact issues concerning who was Ms. Marshall’s employer and whether Toys-R-Us was a subscriber under the worker’s compensation act, and (3) there was no evidence of actual or constructive notice that Toys-R-Us was a subscriber. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Sherri Marshall was employed through the Star of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hidalgo v. Surety Savings and Loan AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Westland Oil Development Corp. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Wingfoot Enterprises v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. PAS, INC. v. Engel, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  3. Brown v. Aztec Rig Equipment, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  4. Lockett v. HB Zachry Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  5. Williams v. Brown & Root, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API