Chase Brass & Copper Workers' Union v. Chase Brass & Copper Co.
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
It was agreed in open court by all parties that the only question now to be determined under the amended demurrer is the legal sufficiency of the allegations of paragraph 3, subdivision (b), of the complaint, and that the only paragraphs of the amended demurrer addressed to that question are paragraphs 2, 5, 6, and 7.
The question thus becomes, in effect, whether, under the lav/ of Connecticut, (1) it is lawful to 'have a so-called “involuntary check-off” as to any employee who has failed to make an individual assignment of wages corresponding to the amount to be deducted weekly as union dues;…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. MayoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Lipkowitz v. FreedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921