Legal Opinion
Travelers Insurance v. Mayo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 19, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.
The various errors assigned by the appellant are grouped in his brief for purposes of argument, and will be stated and discussed in this opinion, as so presented.
The first alleged error is that the court incorrectly held that the facts found brought the case within the purview of General Statutes, § 5277, which secures the payment to the wife upon an insurance policy effected by her husband with her as the beneficiary, or when she takes the benefit of a policy transferred to her, free from all claims of creditors, subject to certain other provisions not material to the present discussion. In…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chapin v. FellowesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
- Spencer v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Lemon v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Pingrey v. National Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Back v. Peoples National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Allen v. Home National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. A.A. McNamara & Sons, Inc., and Arthur McNamaraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Bridgeport-City Trust Co. v. Niles-Bement-Pond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Sigal v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Podzunas v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.