Legal Opinion

Seales v. Amoco Corp.

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided January 28, 2000No. Civ.A. 97-C-1197-NPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CARROLL, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiffs, Kenneth Seales, Maxine Mills, Robert Hilson and Robby Harrelson, former employees of Amoco Fabrics and Fibers Company, proceed by class action alleging that defendants have violated the terms of the Amoco Fabrics Cash Balance Retirement Plan, formerly the Employee Retirement Plan of Amoco Fabrics, and the summary Plan description, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., (“ERISA”), the defendants’ fiduciary duty to the plaintiffs and Amoco Fabric’s…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boin v. Verizon South, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API