Legal Opinion

Cox v. Miller

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 18, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02098Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON STEPHEN EDWARD COX, Case No. 2:24-cv-02098-HZ Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER v. JAMIE MILLER, Respondent. Stephen Edward Cox 4419579 Snake River Correctional Institution 777 Stanton Blvd. Ontario, OR 97914-8335 Petitioner, Pro Se Dan Rayfield, Attorney General Samuel A. Kubernick, Assistant Attorney General Department of Justice 1162 Court Street NE Salem, Oregon 97310 Attorneys for Respondent HERNANDEZ, District Judge. Petitioner brings this habeas corpus case pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

challenging the legality of his Lake County…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API