Legal Opinion

Silliman v. Chrisman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1979No. 11012, 11016PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Judge.

This is a distinctive action for specific performance. It arises from a lease of, with an option to purchase, an 850-acre farm. The plaintiffs are the Lessees-Op-tionees Bill Silliman and Violet Silliman, his wife, (herein referred to as Sillimans) and their assignee Robert L. Lewis (herein referred to as Lewis). The defendants are Lessors-Optionors Jerry C. Chrisman and Helen L. Chrisman, his wife, (hereinafter referred to as defendants Chrisman). The action is distinctive because defendants Chrisman owned only an undivided one-half interest in 1700 acres of which the 850-aere…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Shelby County R-IV School District v. HermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Tebeau v. RidgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  4. Wilkinson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Branner v. KlaberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kay v. VatterottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Husky Industries, Inc. v. Craig Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Cedar Point Apartments, Ltd. v. Cedar Point Investment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  4. Moore v. FryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Citicorp Industrial Credit, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API