Legal Opinion

People v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 7, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed. Memorandum: On this record we cannot determine whether defendant would have been successful if his counsel had made a speedy trial motion (see, CPL 30.30). Defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, because of defense counsel’s failure to make a motion to dismiss the indictment for noncompliance with the statutory speedy trial requirement, may properly be the subject of a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (h) (see, People v Williams, 140 AD2d 969).

All concur, except Callahan, J. P., who dissents and votes to reverse and dismiss the indictment in the following…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. WootenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Peopl v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. StephensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. ManningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API