Legal Opinion

Bassett v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 8, 1970No. 25518PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Justice.

Rule 16 (3) of this court (Code Ann. § 24-4516 (3), 221 Ga. 884) provides as follows: “The brief of the appellant shall consist of two parts: ... (3) Part one shall contain a statement of each error enumerated. It shall also contain succinct and accurate statements of the issues of law as made by the errors enumerated and shall refer to farts of the record and transcrift of the evidence relied ufon in suffort thereof. Any enumeration of error not thus dealt with will be disregarded.” (Emphasis supplied).

The judgment of the trial court denying the writ of habeas corpus must be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estes v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  2. Hicks v. Maple Valley CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  3. Wallis v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Bailey v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  3. Hamrick v. Aetna InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API