Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Maple Valley Corporation

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1967No. 24195PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankum, Justice.

Rule 16 of this court provides that the brief of the appellant shall be divided into two parts; that “part 1 shall contain a concise statement of the case, including a statement of the reasons why the Supreme Court and not the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction, with citation of the part or parts of the record, and if possible the particular paragraphs thereof, showing such jurisdiction,” and that “part 1 shall also contain succinct and accurate statements of the issues of law as made by the errors specified and reference to the parts of the record and transcript of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chapman v. GraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1850

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Estes v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  2. Norton Realty & Loan Co. v. City of GainesvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  3. Law v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  4. Brown v. Mowr Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Wallis v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API