Legal Opinion

Morris v. American Homeowners Insurance

Richmond City Circuit Court

Decided October 6, 1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON

The defendant has objected to that part of the plaintiff's motion under Rule 4:9 which seeks an order requiring Mr. Samuel J. T. Moore, Jr., [his attorney] to produce for inspection and copying the items set out in the motion filed on September 19, 1967. The motion aforesaid is denied.

Because this case is set for trial on October 27, and because discovery is being held up pending this ruling, time does not permit the writer to carry out the desire to write a thorough and lengthy opinion on this most interesting and complex problem which is to what extent Rule 4:9…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Henke v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  3. Buuck v. KruckebergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Manning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1964

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Armstrong v. Bank of AmericaVirginia Circuit Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API