Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pyle v. COURT OF CP OF CUMBERLAND

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1981No. 421-423 E.D.Misc.Dkt.1980PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The instant Petitions for Review have been filed by petitioners, Guy Adam Pyle, Jr., Robert Gordon Eppleman, Jr., and Richard Allan Swartz. All three petitioners are first time offenders charged with non-violent crimes. The District Attorney of Cumberland County refused requests by all three petitioners that their cases be accepted for Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition. Pa.R.Crim.P. 175-85. Petitioners then filed motions with the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County seeking the same relief. The Court, however, refused the motions and further refused to certify…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shade v. Commonwealth of Pa., Dept. of Transp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Independent Tape Merchant's Association v. CreamerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. EbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. PaulSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. HunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API