Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hunter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1982No. 51PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WICKERSHAM, Judge:

This appeal involves a construction of the provisions of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure relating to accelerated rehabilitative disposition.

Rule 175 of the Pa.R.Crim.P. provides:

After a defendant is held for court by an issuing authority, the attorney for the Commonwealth, upon his own motion or upon request of the defendant’s attorney, may submit the transcript returned by the issuing authority to a judge empowered to try cases on information or indictment and may move that the case be considered for accelerated rehabilitative disposition.

Rule 179(c) of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Giannini v. FoySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. DeFeliceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. NovakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RedmondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. ReaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. FeagleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. StrangesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API