Legal Opinion
McCullough v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 30, 1991No. 90 C 1226PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). For the reasons that follow, the court grants the motion in part, and denies it in part.
FACTS
This case involves the alleged discriminatory promotion practices of the railroad company-defendant Conrail. To fully understand the basis for summary judgment and the court’s decision, an in-depth description of the facts of this case is necessary.
Conrail had established a hierarchy of command in its Chicago Division. The head of operations…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McCullough v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992