Legal Opinion

Fanfesti v. Englehardt

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided December 5, 1967No. File 77963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtZarrilli, J.

The defendant’s demurrer attacks the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff’s pleading entitled “By Way of Special Reply.” Therein, the plaintiff alleges the execution and delivery of deeds conveying and reconveying to and from the Church of Nazar ene and the plaintiff certain land incorrectly described in the original conveyance to the church. The demurrer is based on the ground that the corrective deeds do not constitute a defense to or an avoidance of his special defense that the plaintiff is estopped to claim the land described in the complaint because of her admission in the original deed to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stow v. WyseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
  2. White v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  3. Kratochvil v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  4. Billings v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  5. Beach v. Town of TrumbullSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allen v. Johnson, No. Cv 0083610s (Mar. 12, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API