Legal Opinion

Craddock v. Weekley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 22, 1910No. 7513PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Watts, J., Barnwell, May, 1909. Action by Mary E. Craddock against Annie E. Weekley, S. J. Hogg, G. Price Hogg and Jno. F. Weekley. From judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydricic.

This action was brought to set aside a deed and bill of sale, executed by plaintiff on April 27, 1906, whereby she conveyed to her daughters, the defendants, Annie E. Weekley and Sallie J. Hogg, her homestead containing 134 acres, and certain personal property, consisting of a ginnery outfit, farm implements and mules, horses and cattle, reserving to herself, for life, the use thereof. The consideration expressed in the deed was love and affection for her said daughters, and their assumption and payment of certain debts due by her,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Way v. Union Central Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Devlin v. DevlinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. Hooker v. HookerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  3. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API