Wilson v. Wilson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Moore, J. Spartanburg, May, 1920. ' Action by Berry Wilson, father, against R. G. Wilson, son, to set aside a deed. Decree for plaintiff and defendant ■ appeals. The Report of S. T. Lanham, Master, was as follows: The plaintiff and the defendant are father and son. The plaintiff is an old m,an, eighty-two years of age, blind in one eye, partially deaf. He is the father of eight children, the defendant being his oldest son.
Read the full summary
Before Moore, J. Spartanburg, May, 1920. ' Action by Berry Wilson, father, against R. G. Wilson, son, to set aside a deed. Decree for plaintiff and defendant ■ appeals. The Report of S. T. Lanham, Master, was as follows: The plaintiff and the defendant are father and son. The plaintiff is an old m,an, eighty-two years of age, blind in one eye, partially deaf. He is the father of eight children, the defendant being his oldest son. He has reared all of these children to manhood’s estate, and all are living apart from him except the youngest son, who still lives with his father. The plaintiff…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Watts.
This is an appeal from a Decree of Judge Moore confirming the report of Master Danham ordering the cancellation of a deed of conveyance of real estate from plaintiff to defendant, duly recorded. The action was for that purpose, and after issue joined the case was referred to the Master, who made his report, recommending the same.
The report of the Master should be incorporated in the report of the case. Defendant appeals, and by six exceptions challenges the Judge’s conclusions and seeks reversal of the same.
1 The Master and Circuit…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Devlin v. DevlinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- Craddock v. WeekleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910