Griffith v. Segar
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York
In Equity. On Demurrer to bill.
1Opinion of the CourtCoxe, J.
This is an equity action for infringement, founded upon five separate patents, containing in the aggregate sixteen claims, granted to the complainant for improvements in folding beds and cots. The defendants demur on the ground that the bill is multifarious, no reason appearing for uniting five distinct causes of action in one suit. There is no allegation in the hill that the inventions are capable of conjoint use, or that the structure manufactured and sold by the defendants combines all of the patented features. The averments in that behalf would bo sustained by proof that the defendants…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nourse v. AllenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1859
- Horman Patent Manuf'g Co. v. Brooklyn City R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1879
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilkins Shoe-Button Fastener Co. v. WebbU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1898
- Union Switch & Signal Co. v. Philadelphia & R. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1895
- Diamond Match Co. v. Ohio Match Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1897