Legal Opinion

Butler Cotton Oil Co. v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 2, 1922No. 8 Div. 489PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLELLAN, j.

This is an action to recover the statutory penalty for failure, after-notice, to enter satisfaction of a mortgage on the margin of the record of the instrument. Code, § 4898. The former appeal is reported in 204 Ala. 195, 85 South. 778. •

The court, in its oral charge to the jury, distinctly limited the issues for the jury’s solution to the case averred in count 4, in consequence of which no prejudicial error resulted to appellant (defendant) from rulings on demurrers to counts 1, 2, and 3. That on the trial such was regarded as the effect of the court’s oral charge is further…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Saunders v. KohnkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. Butler Cotton Oil Co. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Loeb v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  4. Partridge v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. Long Bros. v. JenningsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burns v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Harris v. Town of East BrewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Burns v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API