Legal Opinion

Burns v. Burns

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 23, 1933No. 2 Div. 28Published

1Opinion of the Court

*62GARDNER, Justice.

The suit is against the administratrix of the estate of J. C. Burns, deceased, to recover on two promissory notes executed by decedent to plaintiff, the one in the sum of $15,-000, and the other $1,100. The notes were secured by a mortgage on real estate, which mortgage was duly recorded. Upon the margin of the record of this mortgage were the following words: “Satisfied, Lucien P. Burns, Transferee. Attest, J. G. Chisolm, Clerk, Probate Court.”

Defendant insists (illustrated by plea 7) that such an entry discloses a satisfaction of the notes upon which this suit is based;…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fleming v. ParrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
  2. Smith v. FellowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Foster v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. New England Mortgage Security Co. v. Hirsch Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  5. Higman v. HumesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API