Legal Opinion

Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Ry. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided March 1, 1928No. Docket No. 11152PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Cost of certain stock acquired in 1915 ascertained for the purpose of determining gain upon the sale of such stock in the year 1917.

1Opinion of the Court

*1147OPINION.

Smith:

The petitioner contends that the $150,000 par value of second preferred stock of the Indiana Coke & Gas Co., which, together with the 1,872 shares of common stock, it sold in March, 1917, for $150,000, was acquired as consideration for the cancellation of $100,000 of the indebtedness of the Monon Coal Co. and that there was a profit of only $50,000 realized upon the sale.

The respondent contends that the petitioner acquired both the common stock and the second preferred stock of the Indiana Coke & Gas Co. in exchange for stock of the Monon Coal Co., which it carried upon its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Canal Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Hartford Fire Ins. v. Bonner Mercantile Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1890
  3. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  4. Baltimore Refrigerating & Heating Co. v. WetzelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Ry. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API