Legal Opinion
People v. Estenson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 12, 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with the trial court that the defendant was denied neither his statutory nor constitutional right to a speedy trial. U In sentencing the defendant, the trial court properly considered defendant’s possession of cocaine even though the cocaine had been suppressed as evidence illegally obtained (see People v Wright, 104 Mise 2d 911, 920-925, and cases cited therein). V Finally, we reject defendant’s contention that the court should have precluded the District Attorney from questioning the defendant before the Grand Jury concerning the cocaine.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- People v. McGrathNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. ManciniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. YungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.