People v. Davis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the indictment should have been dismissed on the ground that his written statement, which was later suppressed as involuntary, was put into evidence before the Grand Jury (see, People v Brewster, 63 NY2d 419, 422; People v Oakley, 28 NY2d 309, 312; People v Estenson, 101 AD2d 687; see also, People v McGrath, 46 NY2d 12, 22, cert denied 440 US 972; *988United States v Calandra, 414 US 338). Further, there is no merit to his contention that the Grand Jury proceedings were defective. The prosecution’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- People v. DarbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. McGrathNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. BrewsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. BurroughsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. GloverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. DoughertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. ShawcrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.