People v. Jackson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the matter remitted to that court (CPL 470.40, subd 2, par [b]).
Although inartfully drawn, the indictment does contain all the elements of the crime and therefore is not defective. Any ambiguity with respect to the precise nature of the deviate sexual intercourse alleged could be, and was in this case, clarified by the bill of particulars (see, People v Iannone, 45 NY2d 589).
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order reversed and case remitted to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. IannoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. GanettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- People v. AlbaneseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. Eun Sil JangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. NicholasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.