Legal Opinion
Rose v. Gelco Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 3, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), dated July 1, 1998, which granted the motion of the defendants Gelco Corporation and Gelco CorpVG.E. Capital Fleet Services pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it for failure to state a cause of action.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff Robert Rose sustained physical injuries during *382the course of his employment with Whirlpool Corporation (hereinafter Whirlpool) when he…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Heritage v. Van PattenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Naso v. LafataNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Rauch v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Soule v. NortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Martinez v. Hitachi Construction Machinery Co.New York Supreme Court · 2006
- Clamp v. HalesNew York Supreme Court · 2005
- Black v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of DelawareDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Laudisio v. Diamond "D" Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003